Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41157253›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Innate Immune Signaling in Gliomas: Regulatory Mechanisms and Targeting Potential in Tumor Progression.

Edmund Jung, Sara Al Jadidi, Christina Piperi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Edmund JungDepartment of Biological Chemistry, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0009-0005-4263-7039
Sara Al JadidiDepartment of Biological Chemistry, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.
Christina PiperiDepartment of Biological Chemistry, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-2701-0618

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gliomas present as highly heterogeneous and aggressive central nervous system (CNS) tumors with challenging diagnosis and management. Traditional and current therapies are lacking efficacy in overcoming the complex and dynamic behavior of gliomas and the local tumor microenvironment. Emerging research highlights the significant role of innate immune receptors including Toll-like, NOD-like and RIG-like receptors, as well as cGAS-STING receptors, scavenger and C-type lectin receptors in glioma development and progression. These receptors can both impact immune modulation as well as facilitate tumor growth through interactions with tumor-associated macrophages, myeloid-derived suppressor cells and cytokine networks, contributing to immune evasion in the tumor microenvironment. Herein, we discuss the main signaling pathways induced through innate immune receptors in gliomas along with their functional properties in glioma pathology while exploring current applications to treatment. Utilizing innate immune receptors as therapeutic targets holds great promise, especially when used along with traditional chemotherapy and radiation schemes, strengthening immune responses. Future studies focusing on the deeper understanding of innate immune receptors signaling and complexity are highly required to enable novel immunoregulatory treatment schemes for gliomas.

Indexed as

brain tumorscGAS-STING receptorsC-type lectin receptorsinnate immune receptorsNOD-likeRIG-likescavenger receptorsTMEtoll-like

Identifiers

PMID41157253
PMCPMC12565395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.