ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Cross-Priming and Cross-Tolerance After Intramuscular mRNA Vaccination for Viral Infections: Feasibility and Implications.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The induction of robust CD8 T cell immunity after intramuscular (i.m.) mRNA vaccination has remained a challenge. Due to the limited presence of professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs) in muscle tissue, this route of administration tends to result in the transfection of muscle cells at the injection site with insufficient T cell activation capacity. The attraction of migratory APCs and related processes that lead to the acquisition of antigenic material from transfected non-APCs arises as a potential alternative to facilitate activation of CD8 T cells in the draining lymph nodes. This indirect pathway, known as antigen cross-presentation, has remained underappreciated for mRNA vaccines. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of this process. Due to the paucity of information available in this context, it also extrapolates from insights for antigen cross-presentation more generally and for traditional vaccines. Arguments are provided as to why this natural process in the context of pro-drugs, such as mRNA vaccines, may engender both specific and nonspecific responses and, in certain situations, evoke cross-tolerance rather than immunity. This widely unaccounted T cell activation process may, therefore, explain several key mysteries surrounding i.m. RNA vaccination, including its impact on heterologous infections. But it also raises numerous open questions that are clearly described.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.