ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Physical and Mechanical Performance of Mortar with Rice Husk Ash and Sugarcane Bagasse Ash as Partial Cement Replacement.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Synergistic Effects and Mechanisms of Plant Ash and Activator on Geopolymer Gel Formation, Hydration Evolution and Mechanical Properties.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Natural supplemental cementitious materials (SCMs) with pozzolanic qualities, such as rice husk ash (RHA) and sugarcane bagasse ash (SCBA), are a promising alternative to the currently used SCMs that are becoming increasingly unavailable. This work presents a comprehensive comparative examination of their impact on mortar properties when OPC was partially replaced by RHA and SCBA. The percentage substitution of OPC with ashes was 0, 5, 10, and 15%. The air content, consistency, compressive strength, flexural strength, and shrinkage of the mortar were investigated primarily. Microstructural characteristics were analysed using porosimetry, MIP, and SEM photography. According to the study, up to 10% replacement of OPC with RHA or 15% with SCBA has the potential to be used as a partial cement substitute while maintaining good mechanical qualities. Mortars with up to 15% SCBA exhibited no significant change in compressive strength after 28 days or a decrease with <11%, while for 10% RHA, there was no difference in compressive strength or increase. Use of 5% RHA decreased shrinkage by 35%, while addition of 5% SCBA by 30%. Obtained results demonstrated the usefulness of SCMs in masonry mortars.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.