ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Optimization of Planting Concrete Thickness and Grass Species for Roadbed Side Slopes.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Planting concrete is a composite material used for erosion control on roadbed side slopes. However, excessive concrete thickness creates an unfavorable environment that prevents the survival of some grass species. This study aims to optimize the thickness and grass species of planting concrete. The stress scenarios of planting concrete, including pedestrian loads and frost heave stress, were analyzed. The maximum internal stress under pedestrian loads and the frost heave stress during freezing were determined using finite element analysis and frost heave tests, respectively. Nine groups of planting concrete specimens with different porosities and water-cement ratios were prepared and tested. The measured compressive and splitting tensile strengths were compared with the maximum stress of planting concrete to determine the optimal mix proportion. Using the optimal mix, planting concrete specimens with three thicknesses were prepared, and six common grass species were selected for planting experiments. Vegetation coverage, plant height, root length, root number, and root biomass were measured for each grass species at three thicknesses to determine the optimal thickness and grass species. The results show that the maximum tensile stress of planting concrete under pedestrian loads and frost heave stress is 0.86 MPa. The optimal porosity and water-cement ratio are determined to be 30% and 0.33, respectively. Ryegrass exhibits the highest vegetation coverage and plant height, thereby determining that ryegrass is the optimal grass species. Planting concrete of 4 cm thickness demonstrates the best root development, thereby determining that 4 cm is the optimal thickness. These findings provide a scientific basis for optimizing ecological slope protection with planting concrete.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.