ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Comprehensive Analysis of the Effectiveness of a Water-Based Extraction Method in Cement Bypass Dust Valorization.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The solid by-product from cement kiln gas installations, known as cement bypass dust (CBPD), is rich in chlorides, which limits the reuse of materials in cement. In this study, three types of CBPD were subjected to an extraction process to obtain a low-chlorine waste material. The relationships between the process parameters, including extraction time (1, 2, 5, 10, and 30 min), temperature (21, 45, and 90 °C), and extraction efficiency, were investigated. The chlorine removal efficiency ranged from 70% to 90%, with the optimal time and temperature identified as 1 min and 21 °C, respectively. Furthermore, a comprehensive characterization of CBPD was conducted before and after the extraction process using X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray fluorescence (XRF), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR); an approach not yet extensively reported in the literature. The results demonstrated that chloride removal corresponded to an increase in concentrations of Ca, Al, Si, Mg, and Fe oxides in the solid residue. For CBPD samples with initial chloride contents of 13.65% and 15.43%, calcium content in the residue increased by approximately 40%. No linear and predictable relationship was observed between the leaching time or temperature and the release of metals in the solid residue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.