ArticleMicroorganisms2025
Infectious Keratitis: A Tertiary Center's Approach to Diagnosis, Management, and Enhanced Outcomes Through Microbiological Analysis.
Article in Microorganisms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation and comparison of the clinical significance of miR-21-5p levels from different specimen sources in patients with fungal keratitis.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Bacterial and fungal keratitis in Northeast Mexico: demographic, predisposing, and microbiological differences among non-contact lens, optical contact lens, and bandage contact lens wearers.International ophthalmology · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe study aimed to assess the diagnostic and therapeutic management of infectious keratitis at a tertiary referral center, focusing on how microbiological analysis influences clinical outcomes.
methodsA retrospective review was conducted on 220 patients (221 eyes) with infectious keratitis treated between November 2021 and January 2025. Data collected included clinical presentation, microbiological findings, treatment approaches, and outcomes. Statistical analyses examined the relationships between microbiological results, improvements in visual acuity, and the need for rescue surgery.
resultsBacterial keratitis accounted for 64% of cases, followed by viral (20%), fungal (13%), and Acanthamoeba (3%). Microbiological testing was performed in 107 cases, with a culture positivity rate of 75.7%. Positive microbiological findings were significantly associated with better visual acuity (
conclusionEarly referral and targeted therapy are essential for optimizing prognosis. The use of contact lenses and cases of ocular trauma should prompt early diagnostic sampling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.