ReviewMicroorganisms2025
Associations Between the Gut Microbiome and Outcomes in Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation: A Systematic Review.
Review in Microorganisms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Oxidative Stress in Multiple Myeloma: Pathogenic Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Redox-Targeted Therapeutic Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard frontline consolidation strategy in fit, eligible patients with chemosensitive multiple myeloma, and it also serves as salvage option in other haematological malignancies, such as diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Moreover, ASCT is known to disrupt the gut microbiome (GM), and the impact on clinical outcomes has been understudied. The aim of this review is to examine the associations between the GM and outcomes in patients undergoing ASCT. Using the PRISMA 2020 guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses, a total of 11 articles were included in this review, comprising both observational studies (cohort studies, case-control studies) and interventional trials (randomised controlled trials). Consistent findings included a notable decrease in beneficial bacteria, including
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.