ReviewMicroorganisms2025
Current Concepts of Local Antibiotic Delivery in Bone and Joint Infections-A Narrative Review of Techniques and Clinical Experiences.
Review in Microorganisms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibiotic Selection for Sustained Local Therapy May Be Important to ReduceMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Rifampicin in Osteoarticular Infections: A Comprehensive Review of Current Evidence.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- [Effects of high-concentration of vancomycin and meropenem on viability and osteogenic differentiation of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026Article
- Using biofilm-targeting local antibiotics to treat recalcitrant medical device-associated infections: driveline infection as a model.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2026Article
- Antibiotic-Loaded PLA Composites for Local Prevention of Implant-Associated Infections: Comparative Evaluation Against Reference Strains and Clinical Isolates.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prophylactic measures and treatment strategies of implant-related bone and joint infections frequently involve the local delivery of high doses of antimicrobial drugs into the affected bone tissue or articular space in addition to the use of systemic antibiotics. Antibiotic-loaded biomaterials, such as Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) cement, calcium sulfate, calcium phosphate, bioglass, and others, have proven to be clinically effective. However, they suffer from important limitations regarding elution and freedom of choice of admixable antimicrobial drugs. In order to overcome these shortcomings, the techniques of direct intraosseous or intra-articular injection/infusion of antibiotics via needles/cannulas or catheters are gaining popularity. Their attractiveness is based on the potential to achieve extremely high drug concentrations in situ, which can be maintained for as long as the catheters are left in place without increased risks of systemic toxicity. Although these methods are still in an experimental stage, reports on their clinical outcomes look promising. This articles summarizes the knowledge of when, how, and in which clinical settings the different modes and philosophies of local antibiotic delivery work best, with the aim to provide surgeons and infectious disease physicians guidance in clinical practice. This will help to optimize the use for the sake of the patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.