Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41156736›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2025

Current Concepts of Local Antibiotic Delivery in Bone and Joint Infections-A Narrative Review of Techniques and Clinical Experiences.

Christof Ernst Berberich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. [Effects of high-concentration of vancomycin and meropenem on viability and osteogenic differentiation of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Christof Ernst BerberichDepartment of Medical Affairs, Heraeus Medical GmbH, 61273 Wehrheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5220-1889

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prophylactic measures and treatment strategies of implant-related bone and joint infections frequently involve the local delivery of high doses of antimicrobial drugs into the affected bone tissue or articular space in addition to the use of systemic antibiotics. Antibiotic-loaded biomaterials, such as Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) cement, calcium sulfate, calcium phosphate, bioglass, and others, have proven to be clinically effective. However, they suffer from important limitations regarding elution and freedom of choice of admixable antimicrobial drugs. In order to overcome these shortcomings, the techniques of direct intraosseous or intra-articular injection/infusion of antibiotics via needles/cannulas or catheters are gaining popularity. Their attractiveness is based on the potential to achieve extremely high drug concentrations in situ, which can be maintained for as long as the catheters are left in place without increased risks of systemic toxicity. Although these methods are still in an experimental stage, reports on their clinical outcomes look promising. This articles summarizes the knowledge of when, how, and in which clinical settings the different modes and philosophies of local antibiotic delivery work best, with the aim to provide surgeons and infectious disease physicians guidance in clinical practice. This will help to optimize the use for the sake of the patients.

Indexed as

biocompatible materialsbioglassbone cementsbone substitutescalcium phosphatecalcium sulfatehydrogelsinfectious bone diseasesintra-articularintraosseouslocal anti-infective agentsprophylaxisprosthesis-related infectionstreatment

Identifiers

PMID41156736
PMCPMC12565966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.