ArticlePathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Evaluation of Suitable Reference Gene During the Development of Paired or Unpaired Female
Article in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIdentifying optimal housekeeping genes is essential to accurately quantify gene expression dynamics across the 18th day (male and female begin to pair) and the 23rd day (female begin to sex mature) post infection of
methodsIn this study, seven widely reported genes (
results
conclusionsThe suitability of any housekeeping gene is strongly dependent on the study's specific context and experimental conditions. Therefore, the conclusions drawn here are explicitly limited to the developmental window of 18 and 23 days post infection. Rigorous, stage-specific validation is indispensable before reliable quantitative gene expression analyses can be performed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.