Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41156546›Full record

ArticleNutrients2025

The Impact of Chinese Adult's Food Literacy on Healthy Eating Intentions Based on the Planned Behaviour Theory.

Yingying Li, Ji-Yun Hwang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yingying LiDepartment of Foodservice Management and Nutrition, Graduate School, Sangmyung University, Seoul 03016, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0002-8986-8377
Ji-Yun HwangMajor of Foodservice Management and Nutrition, Sangmyung University, Seoul 03016, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4003-1293

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) RS-2023-00280503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnhealthy diets are major contributors to obesity and chronic diseases. In 2023, 50.7% of Chinese adults were overweight or obese, underscoring the need to strengthen healthy-eating intentions.

methodsWe analysed a cross-sectional online survey of 1145 adults (18-64 years) from Henan and Shandong. Moderation was tested using multiple linear regression with mean-centred interaction terms between each Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) construct (attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control [PBC]) and each food-literacy component (production, choices, preparation and cooking, intake, disposal). Models were adjusted for age, occupation, marital status, alcohol use, physician-diagnosed chronic disease, and living with family. To address multicollinearity, we performed a ridge-regression robustness check (L2-regularised linear model; λ = 0.02 selected by 10-fold cross-validation; CV-RMSE = 0.483; CV-R

resultsThe overall food-literacy score did not significantly moderate the associations between attitude, subjective norms, or PBC and healthy-eating intention (

conclusionsAmong adults in Henan and Shandong, the intake component of food literacy strengthened the association between PBC and healthy-eating intention, whereas overall food literacy showed no general moderating effect. Interventions should prioritise intake-related skills (e.g., portion planning, lower-sodium choices and nutrition label use) to enhance perceived behavioural control and, in turn, intention. Given the cross-sectional design, causal inference is limited; longitudinal, capability-building evaluations are warranted.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyFeeding BehaviorHealth LiteracyIntentionAdolescentAdultChinaCross-Sectional StudiesEast Asian PeopleFemaleHealth BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adultadultsbehavioural intentionsChinafood literacyhealthy eating habitstheory of planned behaviour

Identifiers

PMID41156546
PMCPMC12567545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.