ReviewNutrients2025
Inclusive Nutrition Care for LGBT+ Patients: Challenges and Opportunities for Dietitians-A Narrative Review.
Review in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nutrition is a cornerstone of public health, yet the unique nutrition needs and considerations of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and others (LGBT+) communities remain largely invisible in the field of dietetics. These populations face disproportionate burdens of obesity, eating disorders, body dysmorphia, metabolic risks, and food insecurity, often driven by stigma, minority stress, and structural inequities. This narrative review aimed to synthesize current evidence on nutrition-related disparities among LGBT+ populations and identify opportunities for dietitians to advance equity in care. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted for studies addressing diet quality, obesity, eating disorders, food insecurity, and metabolic health in sexual and gender minorities. Evidence indicates clear subgroup differences: lesbian and bisexual women are more likely to experience obesity and food insecurity; gay and bisexual men report lower BMI but greater body image concerns and disordered eating; transgender individuals face nutritional challenges linked to gender-affirming therapy and high rates of food insecurity; and people living with HIV encounter additional metabolic risks associated with treatment. Despite these findings, LGBT+ health remains rarely reflected in dietary guidelines or professional training. Embedding inclusivity into dietetic education and clinical encounters, adopting culturally competent and structurally aware practices, and tailoring interventions to subgroup-specific needs are key priorities. Inclusive, equity-driven, and person-centered nutrition care is essential to closing health gaps for LGBT+ populations and ensuring that every patient receives guidance that affirms their identity and lived experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.