Article in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Shan-Shan WangCollege of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.
Tong LiInstitute of Agricultural Products Preservation and Processing Technology (National Engineering and Technology Research Center for Preservation of Agricultural Products), Tianjin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Storage and Preservation of Agricultural Products, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tianjin 300384, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9762-2548
Cheng-Jia WeiUniversity Engineering Research Center of Advanced Technologies in Medical and Biological Intelligent Manufacturing, Guangxi Medical University, Key Laboratory of Longevity and Aging-Related Diseases of Chinese Ministry of Education, Institute of Neuroscience, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Brain Science, Key Laboratory of Basic Research on Brain Function and Disease of Guangxi Health Commission, Nanning 530021, China.
Lan-Yu CuiUniversity Engineering Research Center of Advanced Technologies in Medical and Biological Intelligent Manufacturing, Guangxi Medical University, Key Laboratory of Longevity and Aging-Related Diseases of Chinese Ministry of Education, Institute of Neuroscience, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Brain Science, Key Laboratory of Basic Research on Brain Function and Disease of Guangxi Health Commission, Nanning 530021, China.
Funding
Chinese Universities Scientific Fund 2021TC048Guangxi Key Laboratory of Longevity Science and Technology Open Fund Project No．gxkllst-20241009National Natural Science Foundation of China 32002216National Natural Science Foundation of China 32172772the Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province no.2023GXNSFAA026505
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Developmental Regulation of the Murine Selenoproteome Across Embryonic and Postnatal Stages: Implications for Human Nutrition and Health. · full record | OpenQuestion