ReviewMicromachines2025
Research Progress of Electrochemical Machining Technology in Surface Processing: A Review.
Review in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional mechanical processing techniques are confronted with significant challenges when machining advanced materials possessing excellent mechanical properties. Electrochemical machining (ECM), as a material removal technology based on the principle of anodic dissolution, demonstrates distinctive advantages including the absence of contact stress, independence from material hardness, and elimination of mechanical residual stress and recast layers. These characteristics render ECM particularly suitable for high-precision applications requiring superior surface quality. This review systematically summarizes the applications, recent progress, and current challenges of ECM in surface processing. According to diverse surface requirements, ECM technology is classified into two core directions based on primary objectives. The first direction focuses on surface quality enhancement, where nanoscale planarization, residual stress reduction, and uniform surface performance are achieved through precise regulation of anodic dissolution. The second direction concerns material shaping, which is subdivided into macro-scale and micro-scale processing. Macro-scale forming combines electrochemical dissolution with mechanical action to maintain high material removal rate (MRR) while achieving micron-level precision. Micro-scale forming employs nanosecond pulse power supplies and precision electrode/mask designs to overcome manufacturing limitations of micro-nano features on hard-brittle materials. Despite progress achieved, key technical bottlenecks persist, including unstable dynamic control of the inter-electrode gap, environmental concerns regarding electrolytes, and tooling degradation. Future research should prioritize the development of green processing technologies, intelligent control systems, multi-scale manufacturing strategies, and multi-energy field hybrid technologies to enhance the capability of ECM in meeting increasingly stringent surface requirements for advanced materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.