ArticleMicromachines2025
Robust and Compact Electrostatic Comb Drive Arrays for High-Performance Monolithic Silicon Photonics.
Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Actuating monolithic photonic components (particularly slab waveguides) requires higher force due to their inherent stiffness. However, two primary constraints must be addressed: actuator footprint and fabrication limits. Increasing the number of fingers to provide the required force is not a viable solution due to space constraints, and we must also adhere to the process design kits of standard fabrications and respect their design limits. Therefore, it is crucial to increase the actuator force output without significantly enlarging the actuator footprint while maintaining the necessary travel range. In order to achieve this, we utilize arrays of electrostatic comb drives, with each repeating cell geometry optimized to produce the highest force per actuator footprint. Our optimization strategy focuses on finger geometry, the arrangement of fingers and arms design in the comb structure, including the number of fingers per arm and arm length, ensuring that each repeating cell delivers maximum force per unit area or force intensity. Co-optimizing a repeatable, footprint-optimized comb-array unit cell (arm length, arm width, finger pitch, finger count) and validating it against an asymmetric slab waveguide load, we reach a maximum pre-pull-in force intensity of about 342 N m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.