ArticleMicromachines2025
Continuous Separation of Lithium Iron Phosphate and Graphite Microparticles via Coupled Electric and Magnetic Fields.
Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Driven by the growing demand for sustainable resource utilization, the recovery of valuable constituents from spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) has attracted considerable attention, whereas conventional recycling processes remain energy-intensive, inefficient, and environmentally detrimental. Herein, an efficient and environmentally benign separation strategy integrating dielectrophoresis (DEP) and magnetophoresis (MAP) is proposed for isolating the primary components of "black mass" from spent LIBs, i.e., lithium iron phosphate (LFP) and graphite microparticles. A coupled electric-magnetic-fluid dynamic model is established to predict particle motion behavior, and a custom-designed microparticle separator is developed for continuous LFP-graphite separation. Numerical simulations are performed to analyze microparticle trajectories under mutual effects of DEP and MAP and to evaluate the feasibility of binary separation. Structural optimization revealed that the optimal separator configuration comprised an electrode spacing of 2 mm and a ferromagnetic body length of 5 mm with 3 mm spacing. Additionally, a numerical study also found that an auxiliary flow velocity ratio of 3 resulted in the best particle focusing effect. Furthermore, the effects of key operational parameters, including electric and magnetic field strengths and flow velocity, on particle migration were systematically investigated. The findings revealed that these factors significantly enhanced the lateral migration disparity between LFP and graphite within the separation channel, thereby enabling complete separation of LFP particles with high purity and recovery under optimized conditions. Overall, this study provides a theoretical foundation for the development of high-performance and environmentally sustainable LIBs recovery technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.