Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41156331›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2025

High-Throughput Evaluation of Mechanical Exfoliation Using Optical Classification of Two-Dimensional Materials.

Anthony Gasbarro, Yong-Sung D Masuda, Victor M Lubecke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anthony GasbarroGraphene Microfluidic Laboratory, Naval Information Warfare Center Pacific, Pearl City, HI 96782, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-1509-7281
Yong-Sung D MasudaDepartment of Electrical Engineering, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-6649-9884
Victor M LubeckeDepartment of Electrical Engineering, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8407-3554

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanical exfoliation remains the most common method for producing high-quality two-dimensional (2D) materials, but its inherently low yield requires screening large numbers of samples to identify usable flakes. Efficient optimization of the exfoliation process demands scalable methods to analyze deposited material across extensive datasets. While machine learning clustering techniques have demonstrated ~95% accuracy in classifying 2D material thicknesses from optical microscopy images, current tools are limited by slow processing speeds and heavy reliance on manual user input. This work presents an open-source, GPU-accelerated software platform that builds upon existing classification methods to enable high-throughput analysis of 2D material samples. By leveraging parallel computation, optimizing core algorithms, and automating preprocessing steps, the software can quantify flake coverage and thickness across uncompressed optical images at scale. Benchmark comparisons show that this implementation processes over 200× more pixel data with a 60× reduction in processing time relative to the original software. Specifically, a full dataset of2916 uncompressed images can be classified in 35 min, compared to an estimated 32 h required by the baseline method using compressed images. This platform enables rapid evaluation of exfoliation results across multiple trials, providing a practical tool for optimizing deposition techniques and improving the yield of high-quality 2D materials.

Indexed as

2D materialsclusteringgrapheneimage processingmachine learningoptical classificationparallel computingunsupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID41156331
PMCPMC12566421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.