Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41156328›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2025

Investigation on the Effect of Dynamic Focus Feeding and Widening Path in Nanosecond Laser Drilling.

Jianke Di, Jian Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jianke DiSuzhou Delphi Laser Co., Ltd., Suzhou 215026, China.
Jian LiSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laser trepan drilling and laser helical drilling are typical methods for fabrication of micro through-holes through scanning laser beam. In the drilling process, the subsequent laser pulse may be occluded by the edge and the sputter deposition at the edge of the previous drilled trench. Dynamic focus feeding and widening path can be employed to lessen the occlusion effect and both of them are always employed in laser helical drilling. However, Widening the trench needs to remove more volume of material and may bring certain negative effects such as lowering the recoil pressure as well as less splashing melt due to the limited constraint of trench wall. The effects of dynamic feeding the focal plane and widening the scanning path on the quality and efficiency in the nanosecond laser drilling process were investigated through laser drilling holes with diameter of 500 μm on a 300 μm thick GH4169 plate. Results show that dynamic focus feeding is beneficial in both drilling efficiency and drilling quality. Through laser helical drilling with dynamic focus feeding, micro through-hole can be fabricated in 5 s, and both smaller tilting angle of 0.073 rad and smaller heat-affected zone of 0.63 mm in radius can be obtained. Widening scanning path is helpful to perforating rapidly but leads to much more recast layer coating. the quality of the micro through-holes depends not only on the utilization efficiency of the laser energy, but also on high temperature spatter deposition, which is the source of the difference between different drilling strategies. Due to the low cost in equipment and the better hole quality, the laser drilling, especially laser helical drilling, has potential applications ranging from aerospace fields to normal fields such as the agricultural machinery industry.

Indexed as

dynamic focus feedinghelicallaser drillingsuperalloysthrough-holetrepan

Identifiers

PMID41156328
PMCPMC12565875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.