Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41156325›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2025

Regression Modeling and Optimization of CNC Milling Parameters for FDM-Printed TPU 95A Components.

Kaan Emre Engin, Zihni Alp Cevik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kaan Emre EnginDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Adiyaman University, Adiyaman 02040, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-6439-7700
Zihni Alp CevikDepartment of Electronic and Automation, Besni Ali Erdemoglu Vocational School, Adıyaman University, Adıyaman 02302, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-3141-0160

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Additively manufactured thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU 95A) is widely used in engineering, yet its machining behavior remains insufficiently explored. This study investigates the post-processing machinability of FDM-fabricated TPU 95A using CNC milling, with a particular focus on material removal rate (MRR) and surface roughness (Ra). A full factorial design of experiments (81 runs) is conducted, considering four input parameters such as spindle speed (N; 2000, 4000, 6000 rpm) and feed rate (F; 100, 200, 300 mm/min) on the CNC vertical machining center, together with infill density (ϕ; 33%, 66%, 100%) and layer thickness (LT; 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 mm). MRR is modeled and optimized across all densities, achieving strong fit (R

Indexed as

3D printmachiningMRRregressionsurface roughnessTaguchiTPU

Identifiers

PMID41156325
PMCPMC12566470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.