ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2025
Polypharmacy as a Chronic Condition: A Diagnostic Mindset for Safer and Smarter Care.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cost and utilization outcomes of pharmacist-led medication therapy optimization in a Medicare ACO population.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polypharmacy is typically seen as an unavoidable consequence of multimorbidity and aging, with clinicians addressing complex medication lists unsystematically. In this perspective, we argue that polypharmacy should be managed as a chronic condition. Like diabetes or hypertension, for example, the medication burden shows persistence, progression in its absence despite active management, predictable complications (such as falls, delirium, renal injury, functional decline), and a need for structured surveillance. We introduce a pragmatic diagnostic framework that moves beyond pill counts to modality-agnostic, regimen-level risk across prescribed and non-prescribed medicines. Diagnosis rests on prolonged exposure, composite burden indices (e.g., anticholinergic/sedative load), medication-related complications or prescribing cascades, and the need for a planned review. As biologics, gene therapies and long-acting formulations can lower tablet numbers while increasing monitoring, administration, and interaction complexity. We treat polypharmacy as cumulative pharmacodynamic and operational burden. We advocate stage matched care with unique, functional aims-decreasing the harmful burden instead of mass deprescribing-and position a structured medication review as the standard for polypharmacy with support from pharmacists, shared decision making, and safety netted taper plans. The framework fosters patient-centred care, embedding continuity and equity, and outlines a concise outcome set that integrates pharmacometric measures with patient-reported function and treatment burden. At the systems level, the framework enables registries, recall systems, decision support, and audit/feedback mechanisms to shift from sporadic medication list clean-up to a structured, measurable long-term program. Redefining polypharmacy in this way aligns clinical practice, education, and policy with real-world evidence, fostering a cohesive pathway to safer, streamlined, and more patient-centred care in community settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.