ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Damage Control Surgery in Obstetrics and Gynecology: Abdomino-Pelvic Packing in Multimodal Hemorrhage Management.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applying damage control principles to a ruptured interstitial pregnancy: a case report of the "pack-and-compress" strategy.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- From Adaptive Resilience to Catastrophic Systems Collapse: Endothelial Entropy, Ferroptotic Propagation, and the Maternal Point of No Return in Emergency Peripartum Hysterectomy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Proximal Internal Iliac Artery Ligation in Obstetrics and Gynecology: An 11-Year Retrospective Single-Center Experience with No Clinically Detected Ischemic Complications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Trends, hotspots, and thematic evolution in damage control surgery research: a global bibliometric assessment.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Case Report: Rare case of first-trimester uterine rupture at 9 weeks' gestation following multiple hysteroscopic surgeries and a prior cesarean section.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Damage control surgery (DCS) is a staged surgical strategy for rapid control of life-threatening bleeding, followed by physiological stabilization and delayed definitive repair. Abdomino-pelvic packing (APP)-placing compressive material within the pelvis and/or abdomen to tamponade bleeding-is a cornerstone of DCS as a temporizing measure to achieve hemostasis and stabilization in critically unstable patients. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on DCS with a focus on APP-a technique historically developed in trauma and orthopedic surgery for exsanguinating pelvic bleeding but adaptable to gynecologic and obstetric emergencies. We outline the historical evolution, physiological basis, and stepwise protocol of DCS, adapted to specialty-specific conditions such as postpartum hemorrhage, placenta accreta spectrum, uterine rupture, and hepatic rupture in HELLP syndrome, as well as oncologic surgeries (debulking, exenteration, lymphadenectomy) and benign procedures (trocar-entry injuries in laparoscopy, presacral bleeding in sacrocolpopexy, and retroperitoneal hemorrhage in deep-infiltrating endometriosis). Modern adjuncts-including early tranexamic acid, topical hemostatic agents, and multidisciplinary coordination-have transformed packing from a last-resort maneuver into an integrated component of staged hemorrhage control. In OB/GYN, APP allows for successful hemostasis in 75-90% of cases, with significantly lower mortality rates than trauma surgery. In conclusion, APP as a potentially life-saving maneuver within DCS requires integration into standardized, institution-wide hemorrhage protocols in OB/GYN. Training, simulation, and guideline adoption are critical, particularly in resource-limited settings where advanced interventions for catastrophic bleeding are inaccessible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.