ReviewPharmaceutics2025
Short Peptides as Excipients in Parenteral Protein Formulations: A Mini Review.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Functional Peptide-Based Biomaterials for Pharmaceutical Application: Sequences, Mechanisms, and Optimization Strategies.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biopharmaceutical medicines represent one of the most dynamic sectors of the pharmaceutical industry, with therapeutic proteins forming the largest and most important group. Their structural complexity and inherent sensitivity to chemical and physical stressors, however, continue to pose major challenges for formulation development and long-term stability. Short peptides have emerged as a promising yet underutilized class of excipients for protein-based drug products. Their modular architecture allows for precise tuning of physicochemical properties such as polarity, charge distribution, and hydrogen-bonding potential, thereby offering advantages over single amino acids. Experimental studies indicate that short peptides can serve multiple functions: stabilizers, antioxidants, viscosity-lowering agents, and as lyo/cryoprotectants or bulking agents in lyophilized formulations. Notably, the relatively small and chemically defined space of short peptides-approximately 400 possible dipeptides and 8000 tripeptides-makes them particularly amenable to systematic screening and computational modeling. This enables rational identification of candidates with tailored excipient functions. This review summarizes current knowledge on the use of short peptides as excipients in parenteral protein formulations, with a focus on their functional versatility and potential for rational design in future development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.