ReviewPharmaceutics2025
Targeting the Eye: RNA-Based Therapies, Interferences, and Delivery Strategies.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Small Nucleic Acid Therapeutics for Ocular Diseases: Progress, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Review
- Advances in Gene Therapy for Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Bridging Gaps in Fungal Keratitis Management: Novel Diagnostics, Drug Delivery Systems, and Gene Therapies.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2026Review
- Molecular Crosstalk in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Integrating Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, microRNAs, and Genetic Susceptibility Toward Precision Therapeutics.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Nanotechnological Advances in Ocular Therapeutics: A Narrative Review of Drug Delivery Platforms, Clinical Applications, and Translational Challenges.Nanotechnology, science and applications · 2026Review
- From Tears to Toxins: Mapping Antibiotic Passage Through the Eye-Liver Axis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advances in molecular biology have led to the development of RNA-based therapeutics, offering significant promise for treating various eye diseases. Current RNA therapeutics include RNA aptamers, antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs), small interfering RNA (siRNA), and messenger RNA (mRNA) that can target specific genetic and molecular pathways involved in eye disorders. In addition to their potential in therapy, RNA technologies have also provided tools for mechanistic studies to improve the understanding of eye diseases, expanding the possibilities of RNA-based treatments. Despite the utility of RNA in studying eye disease mechanisms and its potential in disease treatment, only a few RNA-based therapies have been approved for posterior eye diseases. This paper reviews RNA interference and related ocular delivery and posterior eye diseases, focusing on the use of RNA aptamers, siRNA, short hairpin RNA (shRNA), and microRNA (miRNA). Approaches using RNA to advance our understanding of eye diseases and disease treatments, particularly in the posterior segment of the eye, are discussed. It is concluded that RNA therapeutics offer a novel approach to treating a variety of eye diseases by targeting their molecular causes. siRNA, shRNA, miRNA, and ASO can directly silence disease-driving genes, while RNA aptamers bind to specific targets. Although many RNA-based therapies are still in experimental stages, they hold promise for conditions such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), glaucoma, and inherited retinal disorders. Effective delivery methods and long-term safety are key challenges that need to be addressed for these treatments to become widely available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.