ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2025
Fertility Preservation Strategies in Female Cancer Patients: Current Approaches and Future Directions.
Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perioperative safety of emergency ovarian tissue cryopreservation for fertility preservation in hematological patients prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- From Conception to Birth: Bridging Embryonic Development and Disease.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fertility-sparing treatments (FSTs) have gained importance for young female cancer patients, especially those with early-stage cervical, ovarian, and endometrial cancers. However, concerns about the long-term safety of these procedures, particularly in more advanced cancers, persist. A literature review was conducted using databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The search terms included "fertility preservation" and "gynaecological cancer". Articles published between 2014 and 2024 were considered, with 39 articles cited in the paper. The inclusion criteria were female patients undergoing FST. Studies were excluded if prior treatments impacted fertility or if oncological outcomes were inadequately reported. Radical trachelectomy, laparoscopic fertility-sparing surgeries, and cryopreservation techniques, such as ovarian tissue vitrification and oocyte cryopreservation, offer viable options for preserving fertility in early-stage gynecological cancer patients. Radical trachelectomy and cryopreservation showed positive reproductive outcomes, with pregnancy rates of 30-50% in early-stage cases. GnRH analogs during chemotherapy also demonstrated benefits in maintaining fertility. Despite these advances, recurrence in more advanced stages (FIGO IA2 and beyond) remains a concern. Minimally invasive surgeries like robotic-assisted procedures demonstrated comparable fertility outcomes to traditional methods but with fewer complications. FST is a promising option for women with early-stage cancer, offering favorable reproductive and survival outcomes. However, further research is needed to confirm long-term oncological safety in advanced stages. Multidisciplinary approaches and individualized treatment planning are essential for optimizing outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.