Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41155690›Full record

ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Recommendations on the Clinical Application and Future Potential of α-Particle Therapy: A Comprehensive Review of the Results from the SECURE Project.

Valentina Di Iorio, Anna Sarnelli, Stefano Boschi, Maddalena Sansovini, Rosa Maria Genovese, Cipriana Stefanescu, Vlad Ghizdovat, Wael Jalloul, Jennifer Young, Jane Sosabowski and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Emerging Theranostic Radiometals (Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Valentina Di IorioIRCCS Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori" IRST, Via Piero Maroncelli 40, 47014 Meldola, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5380-6185
Anna SarnelliIRCCS Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori" IRST, Via Piero Maroncelli 40, 47014 Meldola, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5986-3845
Stefano BoschiDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4345-1093
Maddalena SansoviniIRCCS Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori" IRST, Via Piero Maroncelli 40, 47014 Meldola, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7699-262X
Rosa Maria GenoveseIRCCS Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori" IRST, Via Piero Maroncelli 40, 47014 Meldola, Italy.
Cipriana StefanescuBiophysics and Medical Physics Department, Faculty of Medicine, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Vlad GhizdovatBiophysics and Medical Physics Department, Faculty of Medicine, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-8233-8862
Wael JalloulBiophysics and Medical Physics Department, Faculty of Medicine, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Jennifer YoungBarts Cancer Institute-A Cancer Research UK Centre of Excellence, Queen Mary University of London, John Vane Science Centre, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.
Jane SosabowskiBarts Cancer Institute-A Cancer Research UK Centre of Excellence, Queen Mary University of London, John Vane Science Centre, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.
Petra KolencDivision of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloska 7, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0003-4746-6740
Rachel RobertsUnited Kingdom National Nuclear Laboratory, Building A709, Springfields PR4 0XJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3398-0821
Govert de WithNRG PALLAS, Utrechtseweg 310, 6800 ES Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Dimitris VisvikisINSERM, UMR 1101, University of Brest, 29200 Brest, France.
Renata MikolajczakRadioisotope Centre POLATOM, National Centre for Nuclear Research, Andrzej Soltan 7, 05-400 Otwock, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6882-751X

Funding

European Union 101061230
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review comprehensively assesses the clinical applications and future potential of alpha-emitting radionuclides available for targeted alpha-particle therapy (TAT) in cancer treatment. The approval of radium-223 therapy in 2013 marked a significant advancement in alpha-emitting therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals, which are primarily used in treatment of prostate cancer. The EU SECURE project was introduced as a major initiative to enhance the sustainability and safety of medical alpha-emitting radionuclides production in Europe. This literature review was conducted by a multidisciplinary team on selected radionuclides, including actinium-225, bismuth-213, astatine-211, lead-212, terbium-149, radium-223 and thorium-227. These were selected based on their clinical significance, as identified in the EU PRISMAP project and subsequent literature searches. The review process involved searching major databases using specific keywords related to alpha-emitter therapy and was limited to articles in English. For each selected radionuclide, the physical characteristics, the radiochemistry, and the pre-clinical and clinical studies are explored. Actinium-225 is the most widely studied alpha emitter, with several preclinical and clinical studies on prostate cancer and neuroendocrine tumours. Other types of tumours (such as glioblastoma) still require preclinical and clinical development. Bismuth-213 bound to antibodies, peptides and nanobodies has shown optimal results in preclinical and clinical studies, with increased median survival and no significant toxicity. Astatine-211 differs from most other α-emitters relevant to TAT, since it yields one α-particle per decay. This offers certain translational advantages, including the simplification of radiation dosimetry calculations and quality control (QC). Lead-212 has the advantage of being an in situ generator with likely widespread availability. Although clinical data are limited, the findings are promising at this stage. The unconventional production of Terbium-149 is the primary reason it has not yet progressed to clinical trials. Overcoming this production obstacle would allow more detailed preclinical investigations. Optimal results with Thorium-227-labelled agents have been observed in preclinical studies, including delays in cellular growth, multiple double-strand breaks and complete regression. Intermediate phase I trial results have also been reported, demonstrating safety and tolerability, as well as an objective response rate of 25%.: The results highlight the advantages of alpha particles in targeting cancer cells with minimal radiation to normal tissue, emphasising the need for high specificity and stability in delivery mechanisms, as well as suggesting that the full clinical potential of alpha particle therapy remains unexplored. Theranostic approach and dosimetric evaluations still represent relevant challenges.

Indexed as

actinium-225astatine-211bismuth-213lead-212radium-223TATterbium-149thorium-227α-emitters

Identifiers

PMID41155690
PMCPMC12567000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.