ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Optimizing Lenvatinib Therapy for Prognostic Improvement in Advanced Thyroid Cancer.
Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RAIR-DTC) is associated with poor prognosis and limited systemic options. This narrative review focuses on lenvatinib (LEN), a multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor that significantly prolongs progression-free survival. Evidence from the SELECT trial and real-world data indicates that its benefits can be enhanced through early initiation, maintenance of a high relative dose intensity, and proactive toxicity management. Planned drug holidays help sustain treatment while avoiding prolonged unplanned interruptions. In selected patients with locally advanced, initially unresectable disease, neoadjuvant LEN may enable conversion surgery, facilitating subsequent treatments. However, the current data are mainly from case series and early-phase studies. After dose reduction, re-escalation can restore disease control, and LEN rechallenge after a drug-free interval may restore sensitivity in later lines. Thus, LEN should be integrated into personalized multidisciplinary care to optimize outcomes across treatment courses. Nevertheless, key limitations remain, as much of the supporting evidence is derived from post hoc or retrospective analyses. Prospective studies are required to validate the optimization strategies, define stage-specific benefits, and determine their impact on overall survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.