ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Using a Novel Consensus-Based Chemoinformatics Approach to Predict ADMET Properties and Druglikeness of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- In Silico Studies of Potent Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Molecular Docking and Pharmacophore Modeling Approaches.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The urgent need to reduce the cost of new drug discovery has led us to create a new, more selective screening method using free chemoinformatics tools to restrict the high failure rates of lead compounds (>90%) during the development process because of the lack of clinical efficacy (40-50%), unmanageable toxicity (30%), and poor drug-like properties (10-15%). Our efforts focused on new molecular entities (NMEs) with reported activity as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (small molecules) as a class of great potential. The criteria for the new method are acceptable Druglikeness, desirable ADME (absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion), and low toxicity. After a bibliographic review, we first selected the 29 most promising compounds, always according to the literature, then collected the in silico calculated data from different platforms, and finally processed them together to conclude at 14 compounds meeting the aforementioned criteria. The novelty of the present screening method is that for the evaluation of the compounds for Druglikeness, and ADMET properties (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity), the data of the different platforms were used as a whole, rather than the results of each platform individually. Additionally, we validated our new consensus-based method by comparing the final in silico results with the experimental values of FDA (Food and Drug Administration)-approved tyrosine kinase drugs. Using inferential statistics of 39 FDA-approved tyrosine kinase drugs obtained after applying our method, we delineated the intervals of the desired values of the physicochemical properties of future active compounds. Finally, molecular docking studies enhance the credibility of the applied method as an identification tool of Druglikeness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.