Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41155456›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Redefining Fascia: A Mechanobiological Hub and Stem Cell Reservoir in Regeneration-A Systematic Review.

Carmelo Pirri, Nina Pirri, Lucia Petrelli, Raffaele De Caro, Carla Stecco

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carmelo PirriDepartment of Neuroscience, Institute of Human Anatomy, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0119-6549
Nina PirriDepartment of Medicine-DIMED, School of Radiology, Radiology Institute, University of Padua, 35121 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7165-3648
Lucia PetrelliDepartment of Neuroscience, Institute of Human Anatomy, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy.
Raffaele De CaroDepartment of Neuroscience, Institute of Human Anatomy, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2307-0277
Carla SteccoDepartment of Neuroscience, Institute of Human Anatomy, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8767-4555

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fascia, once considered a passive connective covering, is now recognized as a mechanosensitive tissue and stem cell niche with roles in regeneration, ECM remodeling, and immune-vascular regulation. The aim of this review was to synthetize evidence of fascia-derived progenitors and their mechanobiological functions across in vitro, preclinical and clinical domains. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science (up to August 2025) was performed in accordance with PRIMS guidelines. Eligible studies addressed fascia in relation to stem/progenitor cells and regenerative outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed with OHAT criteria for in vitro studies, SYRCLE for animal studies and ROBINS-I for clinical studies. Of 648 records identified, 34 studies were included, encompassing 17 in vitro, 17 animal and 4 clinical investigations, with overlap across domains, and 3 reviews. In vitro, fascia-derived stem cells (FDSCs), FAPs and ASCs were shown to remodel ECM, promote angiogenesis and respond to mechanical cues. Animal models revealed collective fibroblast migration as ECM patches, regulated by N-cadherin, Connexin43 and p120-catenin, while CD201+ progenitors directed scar formation. Clinical studies, though few, reported improved outcomes with subfascial PRP injections and adipofascial flaps. Fascia appears as an active mechanobiological hub and stem cell reservoir that may influence tissue repair and fibrosis, although current evidence, particularly from clinical studies, remains preliminary. Despite promising insights, evidence is limited by methodological heterogeneity, emphasizing the need for mechanistic human studies and well-powered clinical trials.

Indexed as

FasciaRegenerationStem CellsAnimalsExtracellular MatrixHumansStem Cell Nicheadipose-derived stem cells (ASCs)fasciafibrosismechanotransductionmesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)regenerative medicinestem cellstissue regeneration

Identifiers

PMID41155456
PMCPMC12562859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.