ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Pan-Cancer Detection Through DNA Methylation Profiling Using Enzymatic Conversion Library Preparation with Targeted Sequencing.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- The Epigenetic Horizon: New Molecular Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based DNA microarray analysis for disease detection using the MICRO-AI framework.Science progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We investigated differences in circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) methylation between patients with cancer and those presenting with severe, nonspecific symptoms. Plasma cfDNA from 229 patients was analyzed, of whom 37 were diagnosed with a wide spectrum of cancer types within 12 months. Samples underwent enzymatic conversion, library preparation, and enrichment using the NEBNext workflow and Twist pan-cancer methylation panel, followed by sequencing. Methylation analysis was performed with nf-core/methylseq. Differentially methylated regions (DMRs) were identified with DMRichR. Machine learning with cross-validation was used to classify cancer and controls. The classifier was applied to an external validation set of 144 controls previously unseen by the model. Cancer samples showed higher overall CpG methylation than controls (1.82% vs. 1.34%,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.