ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Surrogate Biomarkers in Gene Therapy for Orphan Diseases: Validation, Application, and Regulatory Aspects.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Regulatory Alignment on Surrogate Endpoints for Slowly Progressive Ultra-Rare Neurological Diseases: Bridging the Gap Between Biomarker Science and Global Regulatory Acceptance.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of gene therapies for rare hereditary disorders is hindered by small patient cohorts, incomplete characterization of natural disease history, and the impracticality of conducting long-term clinical trials. Surrogate biomarkers-quantifiable indicators predictive of clinical outcomes-represent a promising strategy to accelerate the evaluation of therapeutic efficacy. This review examines the role of surrogate endpoints in gene therapy, outlining essential validation criteria, including biological plausibility, analytical reproducibility, and clinical predictive value. Regulatory frameworks governing surrogate markers in the United States, European Union, Russia, Japan, China, and Canada are compared, with emphasis on mechanisms for expedited or conditional approval. Challenges associated with biomarker validation and extrapolation in the context of rare diseases are discussed, alongside future perspectives that integrate multi-omics technologies and artificial intelligence to enhance biomarker discovery and facilitate regulatory acceptance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.