ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Navigating the Deep Eutectic Solvent Landscape: Experimental and Machine Learning Solubility Explorations of Syringic, p-Coumaric, and Caffeic Acids.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- When Does Machine Learning Add Value over Theory? Predicting API Solubility in Binary Mixtures with COSMO-RS and DOOIT2 Across Diverse and Homogeneous Systems.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Navigating the Solubility Landscape of APIs in Deep Eutectic Solvents: A Data-Driven Thermodynamic Taxonomy of Solvation Regimes and Mechanisms.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluating the Effectiveness of Reference Solvent Solubility Calculations for Binary Mixtures Based on Pure Solvent Solubility: The Case of Phenolic Acids.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Duality of Simplicity and Accuracy in QSPR: A Machine Learning Framework for Predicting Solubility of Selected Pharmaceutical Acids in Deep Eutectic Solvents.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Efficiently identifying suitable solvents for active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) is critical in drug formulation, yet the vast number of possible solvent-solute combinations presents a significant experimental challenge. This study addresses this by developing a robust machine learning (ML) model for accurately predicting the solubility of three phenolic acids (syringic, p-coumaric, and caffeic) in various deep eutectic solvents (DESs), integrating both experimental and computational investigations. Measured solubility data showed that the choline chloride combined with triethylene glycol in a 1:2 molar ratio was the most efficient system for the dissolution of the studied APIs. Different ML models, utilizing nu-Support Vector Regression (nuSVR) as the core regressor and based on descriptor sets derived from COSMO-RS (Conductor-like Screening Model for Real Solvents) computations, were systematically evaluated. A novel methodology termed DOO-IT (Dual-Objective Optimization with ITerative feature pruning) was employed to address the common challenges of model development with limited, high-value datasets. The final optimal 10-descriptor nuSVR model, selected from an exhaustive, multi-run search, demonstrated outstanding predictive power, offering a highly reliable computational tool for guiding experimental screening, significantly accelerating the exploration of DES-based formulations. This research also provides a strong foundation for future machine learning-guided discovery of chemicals, offering an effective and transferable framework for developing QSPR models for various chemical systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.