ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Cardioprotective Mechanisms of Beta-Blockers in Myocardial Ischemia and Reperfusion: From Molecular Targets to Clinical Implications.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Beta-Blocker Therapy for Cardiovascular Diseases on Bone Healing Following Fracture Surgery.Calcified tissue international · 2026Review
- Metabolic Disturbances Associated with Beta-Blocker Therapy: New Insights from a Large-Scale Pharmacovigilance Study.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Plant-derived extracellular vesicles as emerging cardioprotective agents for cardiovascular diseases.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Conventional Antiarrhythmics Class I-IV, Late INa Inhibitors, IKs Enhancers, RyR2 Stabilizers, Gap Junction Modulators, Atrial-Selective Antiarrhythmics, and Stable Gastric Pentadecapeptide BPC 157 as Useful Cytoprotective Therapy in Arrhythmias.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ischemic heart disease remains the leading cause of death despite substantial advances in diagnosis, revascularization therapies, and risk-factor control. Beta-adrenergic receptor blockers (Beta-Blockers, BBs), long used to control heart rate, blood pressure, and reduce arrhythmic risk, may also confer cardioprotection through mechanisms beyond hemodynamic unloading. This review integrates an extensive range of preclinical, translational, and clinical studies to present a comprehensive overview of the cardioprotective effects of BBs in the context of myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury. Mechanistic domains include modulation of redox homeostasis, attenuation of inflammation and neutrophil activation, preservation of mitochondrial integrity and anti-apoptotic signaling, improvement of endothelial function, and stabilization of calcium handling. Third-generation compounds, carvedilol and nebivolol, demonstrate additional antioxidant and vasodilatory benefits compared with first- and second-generation agents; however, no consistent class-wide effect exists across most pathways. The evidence base remains fragmented, often derived from agent- or context-specific studies in heterogeneous populations, with uncertainty surrounding optimal timing of intervention. By bridging mechanistic understanding with clinical outcomes, this review highlights the importance of standardized assessment of BB effects, the development of personalized treatment approaches, and the pursuit of future research to address ongoing translational gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.