ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Real-World Wrist-Derived Digital Mobility Outcomes in People with Multiple Long-Term Conditions: A Comparison of Algorithms.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation Protocols and Validation for Cameras in Indoor Healthcare Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Validation of an Algorithmic Pipeline for Wrist-Worn Devices to Estimate Walking Speed in People with Multiple Long-Term Conditions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development of a Global Functionality Index Integrating Physical Performance and Wearable-Derived Outdoor Walking Metrics in Older Adults.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Digital Mobility outcomes can serve as objective biomarkers of health, but their validation in populations with multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs) based on wrist-worn devices remains unexplored. We refined, improved, and introduced novel algorithms, specifically tailored and adapted for (i) gait sequence detection, (ii) initial contact identification, and (iii) stride length estimation from a single wrist-worn device. Validation was performed using data from 28 participants with co-occurring MLTCs performing a 2.5 h real-world monitoring session. Reference data from an established multi-sensor system were used to assess algorithm performance across diverse gait patterns of co-occurring MLTCs. Twenty-eight participants (mean age 70.4 years, 43% females) had a median of three co-occurring MLTCs. Among six gait sequence detection methods, improved versions of the Kheirkhahan algorithm performed best (accuracy = 0.92, specificity = 0.96). For initial contact detection (nine methods tested), Shin's algorithm achieved the highest performance index (0.85) followed by McCamley (0.84). Stride length estimation was most accurate using novel approaches based on the Weinberg method (performance index > 0.70). The proposed fine-tuned algorithms, the newly developed adaptive variants, and the foot-length augmented versions demonstrated robust performance, surpassing many existing methods and addressing the complexity of gait patterns in MLTCs. These findings enable scalable, real-time mobility monitoring in complex clinical populations using accessible wearable technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.