Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41155101›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Artificial Intelligence in Cardiac Electrophysiology: A Clinically Oriented Review with Engineering Primers.

Giovanni Canino, Assunta Di Costanzo, Nadia Salerno, Isabella Leo, Mario Cannataro, Pietro Hiram Guzzi, Pierangelo Veltri, Sabato Sorrentino, Salvatore De Rosa, Daniele Torella

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Giovanni CaninoDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2800-0200
Assunta Di CostanzoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0009-0007-9963-6402
Nadia SalernoDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Isabella LeoDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4774-0888
Mario CannataroDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1502-2387
Pietro Hiram GuzziDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5542-2997
Pierangelo VeltriDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Sabato SorrentinoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Salvatore De RosaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5388-942X
Daniele TorellaDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4915-5084

Funding

Italian Ministry of Health PSC SALUTE 2014-2020-POS4 "Cal-Hub-Ria" (T4-AN-09) and PNRR MAD-2022-12376814Italian Ministry of University and Research PRIN 2020L45ZWA_005, PRIN-PNRR 2022: P2022NRRB8; PRIN 2020L45ZW4_005, and PNRR-the National Center for Gene Therapy and Drugs based on RNA Technology (CN00000041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming cardiac electrophysiology across the entire care pathway, from arrhythmia detection on 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) and wearables to the guidance of catheter ablation procedures, through to outcome prediction and therapeutic personalization. End-to-end deep learning (DL) models have achieved cardiologist-level performance in rhythm classification and prognostic estimation on standard ECGs, with a reported arrhythmia classification accuracy of ≥95% and an atrial fibrillation detection sensitivity/specificity of ≥96%. The application of AI to wearable devices enables population-scale screening and digital triage pathways. In the electrophysiology (EP) laboratory, AI standardizes the interpretation of intracardiac electrograms (EGMs) and supports target selection, and machine learning (ML)-guided strategies have improved ablation outcomes. In patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), remote monitoring feeds multiparametric models capable of anticipating heart-failure decompensation and arrhythmic risk. This review outlines the principal modeling paradigms of supervised learning (regression models, support vector machines, neural networks, and random forests) and unsupervised learning (clustering, dimensionality reduction, association rule learning) and examines emerging technologies in electrophysiology (digital twins, physics-informed neural networks, DL for imaging, graph neural networks, and on-device AI). However, major challenges remain for clinical translation, including an external validation rate below 30% and workflow integration below 20%, which represent core obstacles to real-world adoption. A joint clinical engineering roadmap is essential to translate prototypes into reliable, bedside tools.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceatrial fibrillationcardiac electrophysiologycatheter ablationCIEDdeep learningelectrocardiogrammachine learningventricular tachycardiawearable devices

Identifiers

PMID41155101
PMCPMC12561549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.