Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41155094›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Examining the Acceptance and Use of AI-Based Assistive Technology Among University Students with Visual Disability: The Moderating Role of Physical Self-Esteem.

Sameer M Alnajdi, Mostafa A Salem, Ibrahim A Elshaer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sameer M AlnajdiEducation Technology Department, Faculty of Education and Arts, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-4974-0507
Mostafa A SalemKing Salman Center for Disability Research, Riyadh 11614, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-9462-2446
Ibrahim A ElshaerKing Salman Center for Disability Research, Riyadh 11614, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-7800-0428

Funding

King Salman Center for Disability Research KSRG-2024-054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AI-based assistive technologies (AIATs) are increasingly recognised as essential tools to enhance accessibility, independence, and inclusion for visually impaired students in higher education. However, limited evidence exists regarding the determinants of their acceptance and use, particularly in terms of psychosocial factors. This study aimed to extend the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) by incorporating physical self-esteem (PSE) as a moderator and behavioural intention (BI) as a mediator within a single model. Data were collected through a validated questionnaire administered to 395 visually impaired undergraduates across five Saudi universities. Constructs included effort expectancy (EE), performance expectancy (PE), facilitating conditions (FCs), social influence (SI), BI, and PSE. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) was used for analysis. Results showed that PE and SI significantly predicted both BI and adoption, while EE strongly predicted BI but not AIAT adoption; FC had no significant influence on either outcome. BI positively affected AIAT adoption and mediated the effects of PE, EE, and SI, but not FC. Moderation analysis indicated that PSE strengthened the influence of PE, EE, and SI on BI and adoption. These findings underscore the significance of psychological factors, particularly self-esteem, in promoting the adoption of AIAT and offer guidance for developing inclusive educational strategies.

Indexed as

AI assistive technologieshigher educationphysical self-esteemtechnology adoptionUTAUTvisual impairment

Identifiers

PMID41155094
PMCPMC12562024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.