ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Application of Machine Learning in Predicting Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances and Challenges in Constructing Bone Organoids Using Cells Derived from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells: A Review.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This article reviews the progress made in applying machine learning to predict the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Bone defects pose a significant clinical challenge due to limitations of traditional therapies such as autologous bone graft donor shortages, allograft immune risks and so on. Mesenchymal stem cells offer a promising solution for bone regeneration due to their osteogenic differentiation potential, but their clinical utility is hindered by unpredictable differentiation efficiency and heterogeneity. Machine learning has emerged as a powerful tool to address these issues by enabling early, non-invasive prediction of osteogenic differentiation and high-throughput analysis of complex data like morphology and omics. This review systematically summarizes the application of ML in three key areas: early prediction using cellular morphology, omics data analysis for biomarker discovery, and drug/biomaterial screening for enhancing osteogenesis. We compare the performance of multiple ML models like ResNet-50, LASSO, and random forests and highlight their advantages and limitations. Additionally, we discuss challenges in data standardization and model interpretability, and propose future directions for translating ML into clinical practice. This review provides a comprehensive overview of how ML can revolutionize MSC-based bone regeneration by improving prediction accuracy and optimizing therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.