Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41155079›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Detailed Kinematic Analysis Reveals Subtleties of Recovery from Contusion Injury in the Rat Model with DREADDs Afferent Neuromodulation.

Gavin Thomas Koma, Kathleen M Keefe, George Moukarzel, Hannah Sobotka-Briner, Bradley C Rauscher, Julia Capaldi, Jie Chen, Thomas J Campion, Jacquelynn Rajavong, Kaitlyn Rauscher and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Gavin Thomas KomaDepartment of Bioengineering, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.
Kathleen M KeefeDepartment of Biomedical Education and Data Science, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.
George MoukarzelMerck & Co., Inc., North Wales, PA 19446, USA.
Hannah Sobotka-BrinerMerck & Co., Inc., North Wales, PA 19446, USA.
Bradley C RauscherDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Julia CapaldiMerck & Co., Inc., North Wales, PA 19446, USA.
Jie ChenDepartment of Neural Sciences, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.
Thomas J CampionDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Jacquelynn RajavongDepartment of Neural Sciences, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.
Kaitlyn RauscherDepartment of Bioengineering, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.
Benjamin D RobertsonXCMR Inc., Narberth, PA 19072, USA.
George M SmithDepartment of Neural Sciences, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2614-1624
Andrew J SpenceDepartment of Bioengineering, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.

Funding

Adaptation of internal motor copy circuits in recovery after spinal cord injury.R01NS117749 · NINDS · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI SMITH, GEORGE M · 2020 to 2024
$2.8M
Chemogenetic afferent modulation to understand spinal cord circuit function and plasticity post injuryR01NS114007 · NINDS · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI SPENCE, ANDREW · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
Intrathecal pump delivery of neurotrophins for locomotor recovery after spinal cord injuryR01NS110605 · NINDS · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI LEMAY, MICHEL A · 2020 to 2023
$1.4M
Craig H Neilsen Foundation 546798NIH HHS 1R01NS114007-20A1NIH HHS 1R01NS117749-20NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS110605NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS114007NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS117749Shriners Hospitals for Children 84051-PHI-21Shriners Hospitals for Children 85115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) often results in long-term locomotor impairments, and strategies to enhance functional recovery remain limited. While epidural electrical stimulation (EES) has shown clinical promise, our understanding of the mechanisms by which it improves function remains incomplete. Here, we use genetic tools in an animal model to perform neuromodulation and treadmill rehabilitation in a manner similar to EES, but with the benefit of the genetic tools and animal model allowing for targeted manipulation, precise quantification of the cells and circuits that were manipulated, and the gathering of extensive kinematic data. We used a viral construct that selectively transduces large diameter afferent fibers (LDAFs) with a designer receptor exclusively activated by a designer drug (hM3Dq DREADD; a chemogenetic construct) to increase the excitability of large fibers specifically, in the rat contusion SCI model. As changes in locomotion with afferent stimulation can be subtle, we carried out a detailed characterization of the kinematics of locomotor recovery over time. Adult Long-Evans rats received contusion injuries and direct intraganglionic injections containing AAV2-hSyn-hM3Dq-mCherry, a viral vector that has been shown to preferentially transduce LDAFs, or a control with tracer only (AAV2-hSyn-mCherry). These neurons then had their activity increased by application of the designer drug Clozapine-N-oxide (CNO), inducing tonic excitation during treadmill training in the recovery phase. Kinematic data were collected during treadmill locomotion across a range of speeds over nine weeks post-injury. Data were analyzed using a mixed effects model chosen from amongst several models using information criteria. That model included fixed effects for treatment (DREADDs vs. control injection), time (weeks post injury), and speed, with random intercepts for rat and time point nested within rat. Significant effects of treatment and treatment interactions were found in many parameters, with a sometimes complicated dependence on speed. Generally, DREADDs activation resulted in shorter stance duration, but less reduction in swing duration with speed, yielding lower duty factors. Interestingly, our finding of shorter stance durations with DREADDs activation mimics a past study in the hemi-section injury model, but other changes, including the variability of anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) height, showed an opposite trend. These may reflect differences in injury severity and laterality (i.e., in the hemi-section injury the contralateral limb is expected to be largely functional). Furthermore, as with that study, withdrawal of DREADDs activation in week seven did not cause significant changes in kinematics, suggesting that activation may have dwindling effects at this later stage. This study highlights the utility of high-resolution kinematics for detecting subtle changes during recovery, and will enable the refinement of neuromechanical models that predict how locomotion changes with afferent neuromodulation, injury, and recovery, suggesting new directions for treatment of SCI.

Indexed as

clozapine-N-oxide (CNO)designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugsDREADDs or chemogeneticsfunctional recovery after SCIkinematicsplasticityspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID41155079
PMCPMC12561374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.