ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Biomechanics of Human Motion and Its Clinical Applications: Instrumented Gait Analysis.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual-Model Artificial Intelligence Framework Integrating AI-Based Markerless Motion Capture for Dynamic Gait Prediction and Health-Status Classification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Emerging Portable Technology Provides Preliminary Predictive Models of Maximum Velocity Sprinting in National Australian Track Athletes: A Foundation for Measuring Sprint Performance in the Field.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Validation of a Markerless Non-Contact Gait Analysis System for Three-Dimensional Gait Kinematics in Patients with Ankle Injuries: A Concurrent Comparison Study with the Vicon Three-Dimensional Motion Capture System.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development and Biomechanical Evaluation of a Modular Knee Prosthesis: From Conceptual V1 Design to an Improved V3 Model.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A review of the methods and applications of marker-based and markerless-based motion capture and inertial measurement units for clinical gait analysis is offered to provide readers with an important historical and legacy-guided perspective. Advantages and limitations of these methods are delineated in light of Cappozzo's 'considerations on clinical gait evaluation' and Brand and Crowninshield's 'comment on criteria for patient evaluation tools'. Critical summaries of each manuscript that make up this Special Issue reflect consideration of the notable comments by the legacy biomechanists who had the insights to frame important issues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.