ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Classification of Hemiplegic Gait and Mimicked Hemiplegic Gait: A Treadmill Gait Analysis Study in Stroke Patients and Healthy Individuals.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improvements in Gait Function Following Integrative Korean-Western Medicine Treatment in Older Adults with Chronic Stroke: A Retrospective Exploratory Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Observational
- Biomechanics and Motion Analysis: From Human Performance to Clinical Practice.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Differentiating genuine hemiplegic gait (HG) in stroke survivors from hemiplegic-like gait voluntarily imitated by healthy adults (MHG) is essential for reliable assessment and intervention planning. Treadmill-based gait data were obtained from 79 participants-39 stroke patients (HG) and 40 healthy adults-instructed to mimic HG (MHG). Forty-eight spatiotemporal and force-related variables were extracted. Random Forest, support vector machine (SVM), and logistic regression classifiers were trained with (i) the full feature set and (ii) the 10 most important features selected via Random Forest Gini importance. Performance was assessed with 5-fold stratified cross-validation and an 80/20 hold-out test, using accuracy, F1-score, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). All models achieved high discrimination (AUC > 0.93). The SVM attained perfect discrimination (AUC = 1.000, test set) with the full feature set and maintained excellent accuracy (AUC = 0.983) with only the top 10 features. Temporal asymmetries, delayed vertical ground reaction force peaks, and mediolateral spatial instability ranked highest in importance. Reduced-feature models showed negligible performance loss, highlighting their parsimony and interpretability. Supervised machine learning algorithms can accurately distinguish true hemiplegic gait from mimicked patterns using a compact subset of gait features. The findings support data-driven, time-efficient gait assessments for clinical neurorehabilitation and for validating experimental protocols that rely on gait imitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.