ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
From Trust in Automation to Trust in AI in Healthcare: A 30-Year Longitudinal Review and an Interdisciplinary Framework.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical AI Beyond Development: A Scoping Review of Deployment-Related Robustness, Algorithmovigilance, and Lifecycle Oversight.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Explainable and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence in Cardiology: A Narrative Review of Clinical Applications, Operational Integration, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Human-AI Interaction in Interventional Radiology: A Narrative Review of Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- Healthcare Professionals' Perceptions of AI-Assisted Clinical Decision-Making in Jordan: A Qualitative Study of Trust, Accountability, System Readiness, and Professional Practice.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Ethical Governance of Large Language Models in Health Care: Trust, Responsibility, and Equity in Routine Use.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Informed Consent in AI-Augmented Dentistry and Dental Research: A Scoping Review.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Eye-Tracked Visual Attention to Anthropomorphic Appearance and Empathic Responses in AI Medical Conversational Agents: Dissociating Trust Gains from Attentional Synergy.Journal of eye movement research · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Prediction of Subjective Refraction and Clinical Determinants of Prediction Error.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human-machine trust has shifted over the past three decades from trust in automation to trust in AI, while research paradigms, disciplines, and problem spaces have expanded. Centered on AI in healthcare, this narrative review offers a longitudinal synthesis that traces and compares phase-specific changes in theory and method, providing design guidance for human-AI systems at different stages of maturity. From a cross-disciplinary view, we introduce an Interdisciplinary Human-AI Trust Research (I-HATR) framework that aligns explainable AI (XAI) with human-computer interaction/human factors engineering (HCI/HFE). We distill three core categories of determinants of human-AI trust in healthcare, user characteristics, AI system attributes, and contextual factors, and summarize the main measurement families and their evolution from self-report to behavioral and psychophysiological approaches, with growing use of multimodal and dynamic evaluation. Finally, we outline key trends, opportunities, and practical challenges to support the development of human-centered, trustworthy AI in healthcare, emphasizing the need to bridge actual trustworthiness and perceived trust through shared metrics, uncertainty communication, and trust calibration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.