ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Measuring the Impact of Large Language Models on Academic Success and Quality of Life Among Students with Visual Disability: An Assistive Technology Perspective.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the rapid digital era, artificial intelligence (AI) tools have progressively arisen to shape the education environment. In this context, large language models (LLMs) (i.e., ChatGPT vs. 4.0 and Gemini vs. 2.5) have emerged as powerful applications for academic inclusion. This paper investigated how using and trusting LLMs can impact the academic success and quality of life (QoL) of visually impaired university students. Quantitative research was conducted, obtaining data from 385 visually impaired university students through a structured survey design. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) was implemented to test the study hypotheses. The findings revealed that trust in LLMs can significantly predict LLM usage, which in turn can improve QoL. While LLM usage failed to directly support the academic success of disabled students, but its impact was mediated through QoL, suggesting that enhancements in well-being can contribute to higher academic success. The results highlighted the importance of promoting trust in AI applications, along with developing an accessible, inclusive, and student-centred digital environment. The study offers practical contributions for educators and policymakers, shedding light on the importance of LLM applications for both the QoL and academic success of visually impaired university students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.