ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Machine Learning Approach for Real-Time Detection of Inadequate Sedation Using Non-EEG Physiological Signals.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sedation is an essential component of the anesthesia process. Inadequate sedation during anesthesia increases the risk of patient discomfort, intraoperative awareness, and psychological trauma. Conventional electroencephalography (EEG) based depth of anesthesia monitoring is often impractical in out-of-hospital settings due to equipment limitations and signal artifacts. Alternative non-EEG-based approaches are therefore required. In this study, we developed a machine learning model to detect inadequate sedation using 27 feature parameters, including demographics, vital signs, and heart rate variability metrics, from the open-access VitalDB database. Patient states were defined as inadequate sedation when the bispectral index (BIS) > 60. We systematically evaluated four temporal windows and four algorithms, and assessed model interpretability using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP). The Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM) achieved the best performance, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.825 and an accuracy (ACC) of 0.741 using a 2 s time window. Extending the time window to 20 s improved both metrics by approximately 0.012. Feature selection identified 12 key parameters that maintained comparable accuracy, confirming robustness with reduced complexity. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of using non-EEG-based physiological data for real-time detection of inadequate sedation. The developed model is interpretable, resource-efficient, scalable, and shows strong potential for integration into portable monitoring systems in prehospital, emergency, and low-resource surgical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.