ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Comparative Analysis of Knee Biomechanics in Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients Across Daily Activities.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a commonly conducted surgery to relieve pain and enhance mobility in patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis. Patient-reported outcome measures are often used whereas biomechanical variables are too complicated for clinicians and patients to assess functional improvement. There is a need for a simplified integrated knee biomechanics index (KBI) to compare improvements in TKA patients across various daily activities and examine the relationships between clinical functional tests and daily activities. Age-, gender-, and BMI-matched three groups (20 each in posterior stabilized TKA, bi-cruciate stabilized TKA, and healthy controls) were recruited and tested pre-op and 6-month post-op to perform walking on level, slope, and stairs, and two clinical tests (timed-up-go, 10-time sit-to-stand). Knee joint kinematics and kinetics variables were calculated from motion data and ground reactions captured at 120 Hz and 1200 Hz, respectively. KBI was developed based on these variables relative to healthy controls. The longitude comparison of KBI and the differences of KBI across various daily activities were identified using repeated-measure ANOVA. Pearson correlation analysis was used to compare clinical tests and KBI of daily activities. KBIs of five daily activities were significantly increased following TKA follow-up. KBI improvement during level walking was significantly higher than those during stair ascending and descending. Significant correlations were found between timed-up-go test time and KBIs for stair ascending and descending.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.