Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41155003›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025

Thriving in the First 1000 Days: Lessons from Positive Deviance Among Young Families.

Andrew P Hills, Sisitha Jayasinghe, Kylie Mulcahy, Nuala M Byrne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew P HillsUTAS Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS 7250, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7787-7201
Sisitha JayasingheIndependent Researcher, Newcastle NE1, UK.
Kylie MulcahyBurnie Works, Burnie, TAS 7320, Australia.
Nuala M ByrneUTAS Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS 7250, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5310-6640

Funding

Department of Premier and Cabinet, Tasmanian Government Not availableMedical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first 1000 days (F1D), from conception to a child's second birthday, constitute a critical window for shaping long-term health, development, and wellbeing. While conventional approaches often rely on external interventions to support young families, the Positive Deviance (PD) framework offers a compelling alternative: identifying and amplifying successful behaviours already present within communities facing similar constraints. This paper explores how PD can be harnessed to foster sustainable, community-led change during the F1D. By uncovering local success stories, promoting participatory engagement, and strengthening caregiver self-efficacy, PD enables communities to co-create solutions that are culturally relevant and contextually grounded. However, effective application of PD requires careful attention to structural inequities, ethical storytelling, and rigorous methodological standards to avoid inadvertently shifting responsibility onto individuals. When implemented thoughtfully, PD reveals "what works" in resource-limited settings, empowering communities to build child-inclusive environments rooted in local expertise and resilient practices.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentHumansInfantInfant, Newbornchild healthcommunity-led changefirst 1000 dayspositive deviance

Identifiers

PMID41155003
PMCPMC12563585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.