ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
The Impact of Anosmia on Intimacy: A Linear Mixed-Effects Model Analysis of Sexual Wellbeing Following COVID-19.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Olfaction is thought to have a role in intimate relationships and sexuality, despite the major roles that other senses, like sight, might have for human beings. Moreover, one of the specific symptoms of the COVID-19 infection, a disease largely impacting human sexuality at various levels, has been the absence of smell. This study aimed to examine the impact of olfaction on partner selection and on different phases of sexual response. Moreover, we evaluated whether the absence of smell could influence aspects of sexual function, such as orgasmic intensity, by comparing subjects with and without COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction. A group of 259 participants has been initially enrolled through social media. Of the 138 sexually active subjects included in the final analysis, 61 (44.2%) reported olfactory dysfunction (anosmia group) and 77 (55.8%) did not (no-anosmia group). Perceived orgasmic intensity was evaluated retrospectively at two time points-during the COVID-19 infection and in the four weeks preceding the evaluation-using the male and female versions of the Orgasmometer. The results revealed a significant interaction between time and olfactory condition, indicating opposite recovery trajectories. Participants without anosmia showed a significant improvement in orgasmic intensity post-COVID-19 infection; in contrast, the anosmia group reported a significant decline over the same period. Although the presence of anosmia was not a direct predictor of orgasmic intensity
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.