ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
When Pedestrian Crossings Become Danger Zones: Trauma and Mortality Risks in Elderly Pedestrians.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimOlder adult pedestrians are at greater risk of severe injuries than younger pedestrians due to gradual physical changes and coexisting medical conditions. This leads to longer hospital stays, increased mortality risk, and higher inpatient costs. Focusing on the aging population, this study explores the characteristics and injury profiles of pedestrian crossing accidents in the capital city of Bern, Switzerland.
methodsOur retrospective cohort study comprised adult patients admitted to our ED between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2023, as crossing (or zebra crossing)-related pedestrian victims. Two cohorts were formed on the basis of age < 65 and ≥65 years and compared according to the setting of the accident, type, pattern of the injury, and clinical outcomes (short-term mortality, ICU/hospital length of stay).
resultsOf a total of 124 patients, 31.5% (n = 39) of patients were elderly (65+ group). In contrast to the younger patients, the aging population was predominantly admitted as inpatients (64.1% vs. 35.3%,
conclusionIn our study, the impact of pedestrian crossing accidents was more severe in the elderly, as indicated by the severity of injuries, hospitalisation rate, longer length of hospital and ICU stays, and higher mortality rates. These findings underline the importance of developing tailored strategies to reduce crosswalk accidents and to optimise management approaches for these vulnerable patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.