ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
Improving Peer Relationships Through Positive Deviance Practices and the HOPE (Healthy Outcomes from Positive Experiences) Framework.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Positive Childhood Experiences (PCEs), including supportive peer relationships, are crucial for optimal adult health and socioeconomic outcomes. As part of a broader initiative to address trauma in youth, we conducted a quality improvement project using a Positive Deviance (PD) approach. We aimed to improve peer relationships among members of the Asbury Park Boy & Girls Club and evaluate the feasibility of using a PD approach in a community-based setting. Using PD methodology, we identified practices used by staff to improve members' experiences. Pre-intervention focus groups with staff and youth, discovery and action dialogues and staff observations identified positive deviants (PDs) and PD practices. PD practices were further defined during staff observations and developed into staff training. Post-intervention focus groups assessed perceived changes. Qualitative data was analyzed using deductive thematic analysis through the HOPE (Healthy Outcomes from Positive Experiences) framework domains of PCEs: Relationships, Environment, Engagement and Emotional Growth. In vivo coding generated subthemes, preserving participant language. Post-intervention focus group analysis suggested improvements in peer-to-peer relationships with club members referring to their peers as "nice" and "kind", a contrast from pre-intervention findings. Findings were supported by club staff during member checking. These results suggest that the PD approach is a promising strategy for improving peer relationships and increasing access to PCEs in a community-based setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.