ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
Understanding Patient Rights: A Pilot Study Assessing Health Literacy in Written Pre-Appointment Letters.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Use of WeChat-based patient-doctor interaction improves patient experience ofFrontiers in digital health · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This pilot study examined how sociodemographic factors (age, education, internet usage) influence patients' comprehension of written healthcare communications, and their understanding of patient rights as articulated in appointment letters. A cross-sectional study was conducted among in-clinic patients at three Danish hospitals. Participants completed a self-administered questionnaire, assessing health literacy through four domains: assessing, understanding, appraising, and applying information from appointment letters. The questionnaire included sociodemographic data, Internet usage, IT competencies, and self-assessed health. Overall, 364 patients participated, with the majority being female and aged between 35 and 74 years. The mean scores for the domains of understanding and applying information were higher compared to assessing and appraising. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that higher education levels positively correlated with the ability to appraise legal information, while frequent internet usage also enhanced appraisal skills. Findings highlight a concerning gap in patients' ability to understand and appraise their patient rights within written healthcare communications. While patients demonstrate reasonable skills in understanding basic information, critical legal aspects remain challenging. Enhancing education and digital literacy may improve comprehension, emphasizing the need for simplified language and alternative formats in appointment letters. Further research is warranted to optimize communication strategies for patient rights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.