ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
Discussing Human and Environmental Health Co-Benefits Related to Diet and Mobility Behaviours in the Primary Care Setting: A Qualitative Exploratory Study.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The interconnection between health and environment is increasingly recognised, as is the role of healthcare professionals in raising awareness among patients and healthcare policymakers. To explore the relevance of enhancing patients' awareness of the links between health and environment in ambulatory care, we conducted a qualitative study on General Practitioner (GP) practices in Switzerland. Using a co-benefit approach, we designed materials on meat consumption and active mobility, which were displayed in the waiting rooms. We conducted observations in five practices and interviewed five patients and five GPs to examine patients' understanding of the messages and assess the acceptability of discussing them during medical encounters. Patients and GPs were receptive to the co-benefit approach. However, barriers were identified in promoting co-benefits during clinical encounters, including time constraints and lack of knowledge. Patients showed reactance to the messages and questioned the reliability of messages related to climate change. GPs were reluctant to compromise relationships with patients and were ambivalent, viewing environmental discussions as political. Positive message display and community promotion were identified as facilitators. This study highlights the need to develop clear educational materials to support GPs, to adapt messages to patients' backgrounds, and to address the dichotomy between GPs' political and scientific perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.