ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
A Community-Engaged Approach to Enhancing Participation in Genomic Research in Rare and Understudied Cancer Populations.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Few studies provide insights on how to incorporate community members' perspectives of genomic research during the early phases of study development. Engaging with community members early and consistently throughout the research lifecycle could help identify and mitigate barriers to genomic research participation, particularly among groups with rare and understudied cancers.
methodsThe Washington University Participant Engagement and Cancer Genome Sequencing (WU-PE-CGS) study formed a Participant Engagement Advisory Board (PEAB) consisting of patients, patient advocates, and patient advocacy organizations who represented the three understudied cancer populations: cholangiocarcinoma, early-onset colorectal cancer in Black Americans, and multiple myeloma in Black Americans. PEAB members were involved in PE-CGS from the time of the grant submission and provided input on key study procedures by participating in monthly project meetings and serving on the leadership team. PEAB recommendations are described in this process paper.
resultsThe PEAB provided key feedback on recruitment, consent, and survey development. Recruitment optimization focused on making the script more concise, tailoring to participant's locale, and providing clearer participation expectations. Consent improvements prioritized key information, addressed data protection, and clarified the process of returning genetic results. Survey enhancements included refining scientific terminology and ensuring inclusivity across the cancer continuum.
conclusionsThe PEAB provided valuable feedback that improved the development and implementation of WU-PE-CGS research processes. Incorporating the PEAB's suggestions helped ensure that patients with rare and understudied cancers were successfully enrolled into the WU-PE-CGS. The PEAB will continue to contribute throughout all study phases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.