ArticleBiology2025
Influence of Sampling Effort and Taxonomic Resolution on Benthic Macroinvertebrate Taxa Richness and Bioassessment in a Non-Wadable Hard-Bottom River (China).
Article in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Benthic macroinvertebrates are widely used for river ecosystem health monitoring, yet challenges remain in non-wadable rivers, particularly regarding sampling effort. We evaluated hand-net sampling efficiency at three sites along the Danjiang River (a Yangtze River tributary) by analyzing taxa richness across taxonomic levels under varying replicate numbers. In total, 61 taxa (41 families) of benthic macroinvertebrates were identified. Non-metric multidimensional scaling analysis indicated no significant spatiotemporal variation in community composition. However, sampling effort increased, and the benthic macroinvertebrate taxa richness at both genus/species and family levels also increased. At eight sample replicates, the taxa accumulation curve at the genus/species level did not show an asymptote, with the observed richness reaching 67-80% of the predicted values calculated by Jackknife 1. In contrast, the family-level curve exhibited a clear asymptotic trend, with the observed richness reaching 82-100% of the predicted values. As sampling effort increased, bias decreased and accuracy improved, particularly for family-level taxa. Additionally, the BMWP scores also increased with the sampling effort. When the replicate number was no less than six, the BMWP reached stable assessment grades for all cases. From the perspective of bioassessment in non-wadable rivers, the hand net is suitable for collecting benthic macroinvertebrates. However, there is a risk of underestimating taxa richness due to insufficient sampling effort. Using family-level taxa can partially mitigate the impacts caused by insufficient sampling efforts to a certain extent, but further validation is needed for other non-wadable rivers (e.g., those with soft substrates). In conclusion, our research results indicate that six replicate hand-net samplings in non-wadable hard-bottom rivers can be regarded as a cost-effective and reliable sampling method for benthic macroinvertebrate BMWP assessment. This strategy provides a relatively practical reference for the monitoring of benthic macroinvertebrate in the same type of rivers in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.